Legal Opinion

Barchfeld v. Nunley by Nunley

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 20, 1990No. 1458PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DEL SOLE, Judge:

The sole issue before us is whether in an action filed by a husband and wife for personal injuries sustained by the husband plaintiff, where a loss of consortium claim has been filed by the wife in the same action, it is permissible and proper to join the husband as an additional defendant pursuant to Rule 2252(d) on the wife’s claim for loss of consortium. We hold that it is not permissible and affirm the trial court’s sustaining of husband’s preliminary objections to his joinder as an additional defendant.

Henry and Laverne Barchfeld, plaintiff/appellees, filed a personal…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Buttermore v. Aliquippa HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Scattaregia v. Shin Shen WuSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Rosander v. Copco Steel & Engineering Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Maidman v. StaggAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  5. Manzitti v. AmslerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. In Re ShumacUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
  3. Bada, J. v. Comcast CorporationSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  4. Budner v. Allegheny General Hospital, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County2005
  5. Dunlap-Davenport v. Villas at Tree Tops & Fairway, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Monroe County2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API