Legal Opinion
People v. Masten
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided March 17, 1980No. Docket 77-3463PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDanhof, C.J.
The defendant was charged with attempting to procure an act of gross indecency, MCL 750.338; MSA 28.570.1 At his trial before the *129bench, the people’s evidence indicated that on the evening of August 6, 1976, the defendant approached three Grand Rapids police officers in the vicinity of that city’s Pantlind Hotel and offered to perform acts of fellatio for the sum of $25. One of the officers asked the defendant "if he had a place to go”. The defendant replied that he did not, and was arrested without further conversation. The defendant testified that his offer was the product of threats…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. National Dairy Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Rose v. LockeSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Wainwright v. StoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. KalchikMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. DauerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
- People v. EmmerichMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
- People v. MastenMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
- People v. MyersMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.