Itel Containers International Corp. v. Puerto Rico Marine Management, Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LACEY, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
The underlying action having been terminated, this opinion addresses the issue of what sanctions, if any, should be imposed upon the defendant corporation and its counsel, the Washington, D.C. law firm which was, at the outset of the lawsuit, admitted pro hac vice, and its local New Jersey counsel.
The regrettable necessity for considering sanctions has arisen from the undeniable abuse of the judicial process by the defendant and its counsel. Aware from the time they received the complaint that the plaintiff had mistakenly invoked diversity…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Eastway Construction Corp. v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- James Elliott and Joseph Defley v. Leander H. Perez, Jr., Etc., Eugene E. Leon, Jr., Etc., and Frank KleinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Baker v. Gold Seal Liquors, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Eash v. Riggins Trucking Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Galligan v. Westfield Centre Service, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Tuck v. United Services Automobile Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Masone v. LevineNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
- National Ass'n of Radiation Survivors v. TurnageDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1987
- United States v. Alejandro Ceja-PradoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Gilbert v. Board of Medical ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.