Norman v. Lacroix
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
TALIAFERRO, Judge.
Plaintiff and defendant own the Acme plantation in Grant parish, La. The interest of each therein has been fixed by partition between them. The plantation work stock and farming implements are .undivided. Plaintiff, in writing, leased to defendant her part of the plantation, some 361.50 acres, excepting hay meadow of approximately 35 acres, and her interest in the work stock and farming implements for the year 1932 for $1,000. The leased premises is located on or near Red river, and is subject to inundation from that stream. In the contract of lease the following stipulation…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Viterbo v. FriedlanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Jackson v. MichieSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1881
- Hollingsworth v. Atkins Bros.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1894
- Vinson v. GravesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1861
- Payne v. James & TragerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1893
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dikert v. RuizLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1970
- Brignac v. BoisdoreLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1973
- Catalanotto v. TAC Amusement Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1970