Legal Opinion

Citizens National Bank v. City of Cincinnati

Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati

Decided June 1, 1909Published

1Opinion of the CourtHopeheimeb, J.

Plaintiff, a national bank of Cincinnati, seeks the" equitable intervention of this court, and asks that the court compel the defendants to issue to plaintiff a substitute bond in place of one alleged to have been misplaced by it, ■ " ' ' ' "

*394In its petition it asserts ownership of a certain conpon bond issued and sold by the city of Cincinnati on the 1st day of June, 1905, in the sum of $500, with interest at 3% per cent, per annum, payable semi-annually, in December and June of each succeeding year, the bond itself maturing in June, 1905. The bond was one of seven hundred of a similar issue,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commissioners of Taxing Dist. of Brownsville v. LoagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Rogan v. City of WatertownWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Bainbridge v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1885
  4. Clarke v. JanesvilleDistrict Court, D. Wisconsin · 1856

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API