Gibson Products Co. v. United States
District Court, N.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ROBERT M. HILL, District Judge.
Came on for trial before the court the above-styled cause. Having considered the pleadings, testimony, stipulations and argument of counsel, the court is of the opinion that judgment should be rendered for the plaintiff in part and for the defendant in part.
Facts
The facts which give rise to this lawsuit are summarized in the following manner. Plaintiff, a Texas corporation having its principal place of business in Wichita Falls, Texas, became a limited partner in 1972 of the McNeill Street Drilling Venture (“McNeill Street”), a Texas…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- United States v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Crane v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Estate of Charles T. Franklin, Deceased v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- Mayerson v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1966
- Bolger v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1973
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Saviano v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1983
- Brountas v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1979
- Paul P. Brountas v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Paul P. And Lynn T. Brountas v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
- Gibson Products Co. Kell Blvd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- John F. Tufts and Mary A. Tufts v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.