Legal Opinion · Dissent

City of Lancaster v. Department of Environmental Resources

Pennsylvania Environmental Hearing Board

Decided April 10, 1978No. nos. 77-193-W and 77-197-WPublished

1Dissent

THOMAS M. BURKE,

dissenting: The City of Lancaster and the Lancaster City Sewer Authority, referred to jointly herein as appellants, in early December 1977, filed a timely appeal from a letter of the Department of Environmental Resources dated November 23, 1977, notifying appellants that the North Sewage Treatment Plant was determined by the DER to be hydraulically overloaded and as a result appellants were required to comply with the requirements of section 94.21 of the DER’s rules and regulations, 25 Pa. Code §94.21. On December 30, 1977, the Home Builders Association (intervenor) was…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Schacter v. AlbertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  3. Uniontown Area School District v. Pennsylvania Human Relations CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Bilbar Construction Co. v. Easttown Township Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  5. Bortz Coal Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API