Legal Opinion

Lessee of Drinker v. Holliday

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 15, 1796PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Ejectment for 326 acres of land in Erankstown township. The plaintiff claimed under a warrant to Samuel Litton, dated 1st August 1766, a survey thereon by Bichard Tea, on the 15th June 1767, a deed from Litton to Samuel Wallis, dated 30th September 1766, a patent to Wallis, dated 28th February 1782, a conveyance from Samuel Wallis and wife to Abel James, and the lessor of the plaintiff, dated 4th September 1782, and a release from James to him on the 8th April 1781. The…

Read the full summary

Ejectment for 326 acres of land in Erankstown township. The plaintiff claimed under a warrant to Samuel Litton, dated 1st August 1766, a survey thereon by Bichard Tea, on the 15th June 1767, a deed from Litton to Samuel Wallis, dated 30th September 1766, a patent to Wallis, dated 28th February 1782, a conveyance from Samuel Wallis and wife to Abel James, and the lessor of the plaintiff, dated 4th September 1782, and a release from James to him on the 8th April 1781. The defence was grounded on a location, (as it is called,) in the name of Timothy M’Kinley, dated 3d March 1763, a survey…

1Opinion of the Court

Verdict for the plaintiff.

[Note, tho same general outlines in effect were given in charge at the same assizes, between the lessee of John Hollinshead and Thomas Pollack, and the jury found accordingly.]

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mineral Railroad & Mining Co. v. AutenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
  2. Reilly v. Mountain Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
  3. Martin v. HughesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1898
  4. Fritz v. BrandonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1875
  5. Acre v. GilbertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1832

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API