Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Dunkley v. Alford

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 18, 1984No. K-1825PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CIACCIO, Judge.

This matter is before this court on the defendant’s pro se application for writs of habeas corpus, certiorari and review. In this application the defendant complains that he was not afforded effective legal representation; he was not given adequate notice and opportunity to interrogate wit*415nesses at his revocation of probation hearing and that the trial judge abused his discretion when he revoked the defendant’s probation in that he did not give sufficient weight to the testimony of the defense witnesses.

Ineffective Counsel

Defendant complains that he did not receive effective…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. JonesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1984

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. RussellLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1990
  2. Shane Landry Versus Darell VannoyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2026
  3. State of Louisiana Versus Cyrus LondonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API