In Re Steen
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Dissent
Ethridge, J.,
delivered the dissenting opinion.
I take it that there is no .question about the power of the Constitutional Convention to partition the judicial power of the state aniong- the various courts which it deems necessary to create, and give to each court such jurisdiction as it sees proper, and to limit the jurisdiction of any court to a particular subject or subjects, •on which the judicial power acts. By section 144 of the Constitution of 1890 the Constitutional Convention vested the entire judicial power of the state in the courts created by the Constitution. It provides: ‘ ‘ The…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Ex Parte GarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Hayburn's CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1792
- United States v. FerreiraSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
- Burks v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.