Legal Opinion

Braziel v. Hunter

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 10, 1961No. 38720PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nichols, Judge.

1. “In all applications for a new trial the opposite party shall be served with a copy of the rule nisi, unless such copy is waived.” Code § 70-306; McMullen v. Citizens Bank, 123 Ga. 400 (1) (51 S. E. 342); Smedley v. Williams, 112 Ga. 114 (37 S. E. 111).

2. Personal service is required where service of the rule nisi, in connection with the motion for new trial, is not waived. Jones v. Fox, 49 Ga. App. 573 (176 S. E. 530); Petty v. Complete Auto Transit, Inc., 215 Ga. 66 (3) (108 S. E. 2d 697).

3. A judgment dismissing a motion for new trial, on motion of the respondent made at…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smedley v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  2. Petty v. Complete Auto Transit, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1959
  3. McMullen v. BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  4. Jones v. FoxCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dunn v. DunnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1965
  2. Braziel v. HunterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  3. Dunn v. DunnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1965
  4. Wiggins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API