Legal Opinion

Akers v. State

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided December 23, 2016No. 2529 A-12009PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Judge MANNHEIMER.

The Petitioner, Bambi Akers, is facing a probation revocation proceeding in the district court. Over Akers’s objection, this revocation proceeding has been assigned to a magistrate judge. Akers argues that she has a statutory right to insist that a district court judge conduct the revocation proceeding.

To resolve this question, we must interpret AS 22.15.120—the statute that defines the authority of magistrate judges.

No provision of AS 22,15,120 expressly deals with probation revocation proceedings. However, three subsections of the statute— (a)(5), (a)(6), and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Libby v. City of DillinghamAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Kvasnikoff v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Stevens v. Matanuska-Susitna BoroughCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2006
  4. Trenton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1990

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Agnes Martina Tommy v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API