Legal Opinion

In the Interest of C. N. S.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 18, 2006No. A06A1943PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mikell, Judge.

Following his adjudication of delinquency for committing the offenses of criminal attempt to commit armed robbery, aggravated assault, pointing a gun at another, and possession of a gun by a minor, C. N. S. appeals, arguing that the evidence was insufficient to show that he was involved in the commission of the delinquent acts. Finding no merit to this argument, we affirm.

When considering the sufficiency of the evidence to support a juvenile court’s adjudication of delinquency, this court applies the standard set forth in Jackson v. Virginia. Thus, *4we construe the evidence in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. In the Interest of R. J. S.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  3. In the Interest of J. D. T.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2003

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In the Interest of R. S.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  2. In the Interest of R. W.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  3. In Re RSCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  4. In Re RwCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API