Legal Opinion

People v. Aponte

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 29, 1985PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Defendant’s challenge to the sufficiency of the plea allocution is not preserved for appellate review as a matter of law (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Hoke, 62 NY2d 1022; People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636). In any event, the allocution satisfied the requirements of People v Harris (61 NY2d 9) and thus vacatur is not warranted (see, People v De Santis, 108 AD2d 821); People v Schron, 109 AD2d 762).

We note that during the plea proceedings, the court promised to sentence defendant to five years to life imprisonment in exchange for his guilty plea. Defendant indicated his acceptance of such a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. People v. PellegrinoNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. People v. HokeNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. People v. WrightNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. People v. De SantisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. LernerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  2. People v. OrtizAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  3. People v. StokesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API