Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Carter v. Pino

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 28, 2014No. 3D13-66Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

EMAS, J,

concurring in part and dissenting in part.

Appellant and Appellee are both pro se in this appeal (and in the proceedings below). The trial court originally entered final judgment in favor of Appellant/Plaintiff below. Upon motion filed by Appel-lee/Defendant, the trial court set aside that final judgment. Appellant then moved for rehearing of the trial court’s order setting aside the final judgment. The trial court denied the rehearing and, in that same order, dismissed Appellant’s complaint with prejudice.

I concur with the majority’s affirmance of the trial court’s order denying…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Edward L. Nezelek, Inc. v. Sunbeam Tel. Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  2. Harris v. FilmonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API