Legal Opinion

Boehm v. Heston

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 25, 1936No. Appeal, 27PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Schaffer,

It is urged upon us by appellant, against whom a verdict was recovered in the court below, that judgment should be entered in his favor notwithstanding the verdict, or, if this shall not be done, that a new trial should be awarded. We are unable to assent to either of these determinations.

The action grows out of the collision of two trucks, one driven by plaintiff and the other by defendant’s employee. The collision occurred at the intersection of two roads. It was practically a T intersection. (The angle of approach was not exactly a right angle.) The…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hogg v. MuirSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  2. Higgins v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Brown Et Ux. v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  4. Coleman v. Quaker State Coca-Cola Bottling Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1971
  5. Balzer v. Reith Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API