Legal Opinion · Dissent

Indiana State Board of Tax Commissioners v. Stanadyne, Inc.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 24, 1982No. 3-1081A256Published

1DissentGarrard, Judge

While I agree with the majority view that it was error to grant a larger exemption than that properly claimed by Stana-dyne, I feel I must dissent to the grant of the exemption.

The majority acknowledges that exemptions from taxation are not favored and should be strictly construed. Indiana Dept. of State Revenue v. The Boswell Oil Co. (1971), 148 Ind.App. 569, 268 N.E.2d 303.

As I understand the question posed by this litigation, the property was taxable unless imposition of the tax was forbidden by the Commerce Clause of the Constitution of the United States. More precisely, the question is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Minnesota v. BlasiusSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Independent Warehouses, Inc. v. ScheeleSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Indiana Department of State Revenue v. Boswell Oil Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1971
  4. United States v. Great Lakes Pipe Line CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API