Legal Opinion

Edwards v. Target Corp.

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided April 23, 2013No. Case No. 3:11-CV-000138Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

THOMAS B. RUSSELL, Senior District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on the Plaintiffs’ motion for new trial. (Pis.’ Mot., Docket Number (“DN”) 62.) The Defendant has responded. (Def.’s Resp., DN 66.) The Plaintiffs have replied. (Pis.’ Reply, DN 67.) Fully briefed, this matter is now ripe for adjudication. Having considered the matter and being fully advised, the Plaintiffs’ motion is GRANT*837ED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. This action is REOPENED and the Plaintiffs are granted a new trial on the issue of damages but not as to the apportionment of liability.

I

Pla…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ortiz v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  2. Linda Holmes v. City of Massillon, OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  3. Deutsch v. SheinKentucky Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Osborne v. KeeneyKentucky Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Thomas J. Dillon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API