Legal Opinion

State v. Phipps

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 11, 1933No. 24501. Department TwoPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

The defendant in this proceeding was charged with contempt of the superior court. The trial resulted in a judgment of dismissal, from which the plaintiff, the state, appeals.

The facts may be summarized as follows: Harve H. Phipps, an attorney at law, was employed by the ad-ministratrix of an estate to carry on the probate pro ceedings. After the administratrix had taken her oath of office, bnt prior to the time that she had qualified as such by giving the bond required by the court, the respondent borrowed from her out of the funds of the estate the sum of fifteen hundred dollars for his own…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gompers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Allen v. WoodwardTexas Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Allen v. WoodwardTexas Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Rudd v. RuddCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
  5. Wise v. ChaneySupreme Court of Iowa · 1885

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Robinson v. HartenbachSupreme Court of Missouri · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API