Legal Opinion
Rodeman v. Foster
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided March 16, 2011No. Civil Action 09-cv-01857-PAB-MJWPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
PHILIP A. BRIMMER, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on defendants’ motion for summary judgment [Docket No. 46]. The motion is fully briefed and ripe for disposition. For the following reasons, the Court will grant the motion in part and deny it in part.
I. JURISDICTION
Plaintiff asserts claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, as well as the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution. The Court therefore has federal-question jurisdiction over these claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331. Plaintiff also asserts claims…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Brifen USA, Inc. v. Briggs Brothers Enterprises Corporation et al.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2026
- Insight Investments, LLC v. North American Specialty Insurance Company; North American Specialty Insurance Company v. Sasha M. BellDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2026
- Marta v. City of Las CrucesDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2024
- Pham v. Clear Screening Technologies LLCDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2022
- Thurman v. Oklahoma County CommissionersDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2019