Legal Opinion
Wilkinson v. Cohen
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided October 18, 1951No. 6 Div. 262PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STAKELY, Justice.
The question for decision is whether the court abused its discretion in setting aside a judgment by default.' The suit was begun- by an attachment sued out by Wilkinson and Skinner, partners doing business as Wilkinson & Skinner, against Harry Cohen, a nonresident residing at Memphis, Tenn. The attachment was levied by service of a sheriff’s garnishment on Milton Andrews, President of the Bank for Savings and Trusts, at Birmingham, Alabama.
The garnishee filed his -answer and notice to the nonresident defendant of the levy .and pendency of the attachment was published for…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ex Parte State Ex Rel. Atlas Auto Finance Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1948
- City of Birmingham v. GoolsbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Du Pree v. HartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
- State Ex Rel. St. Peter's M. Baptist Church v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- Kolb v. Swann Chemical CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Rush v. SimpsonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1979
- Orkin Exterminating Company v. O'HANLONSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Ex parte ParkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
- Allan Wayne Morton v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Allan Wayne Morton v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983