Legal Opinion
Arceneaux v. Amstar Corp.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided May 14, 2010No. 2009-CA-0980PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
DENNIS R. BAGNERIS, SR., Judge.
| Continental Casualty Company appeals the judgement of the 34th Judicial District arguing that the district court ignored this Court’s instruction when we remanded this case in October 2007. The judgment of the 34th Judicial District resulted in the granting of a motion for summary judgment in favor of Tate & Lyle North American Sugars, Inc., casting judgment against Continental Casualty in the amount of $359,925.21 and settling with 15 plaintiffs. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the April 15 and April 29, 2009, judgments of the district court.
The…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Steptore v. Masco Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
- Potter v. FIRST FEDERAL S & L ASS'N OF SCOTLANDVILLESupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- Yount v. MaisanoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- Yarbrough v. Federal Land Bank of JacksonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1999
- Mossy Motors, Inc. v. Cameras AmericaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2005
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Arceneaux v. Amstar Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2011