Legal Opinion

Croghan v. Umplebaugh

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 14, 1917PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Harrison District Court. — E. B. Woodruff, Judge. Action in equity fot a new trial. Demurrer to petition sustained. Judgment dismissing petition. Plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtGaynor, C. J.

grounds1:^' peuuiy. On the 8th day of May, 1914, the plaintiff herein filed his petition,on the equity side of the calendar, praying that a certain judgment, heretofore entered against him in a replevin suit, be set aside, and a new trial granted. The facts are that the defendant herein, William Umplebaugh, commenced a certain replevin suit against the plaintiff to obtain the possession of, one red calf. The action was originally commenced in the justice court; afterwards transferred to the district court. In the district court, the case was tried, and on the 31st day of March, 1914,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Graves v. GravesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  2. Peterson v. BlantonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Murphy v. HahnSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929
  2. Abell v. PartelloSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  3. Holmes v. HolmesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1920
  4. Weinhart v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  5. Hewitt v. BlaiseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API