Legal Opinion

Sheppard v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 5, 1976No. 51551PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stolz, Judge.

The defendant appeals from his conviction and sentence in a bench trial, of two counts of violation of the Georgia Controlled Substances Act.

1. Enumerated errors 2, 5 and 6 all pertain to or depend upon the trial judge’s order denying the defendant’s motion to suppress evidence, which motion attacked the sufficiency of the search warrant and affidavit. The warrant and affidavit were in effect admitted in evidence by the parties’ stipulation at the. hearing on the motion that non-certified copies of these documents be considered as the originals and designated as state’s exhibits…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Marshall v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  2. Bell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  3. Kenerleber v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  4. Interstate Financial Corp. v. AppelSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  5. Veasey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. RichardsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. Young v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  3. Luke v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  4. Anderson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  5. Sisson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API