Legal Opinion

Marchand v. Haber

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1896PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Action for trespass vi et armis.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAdam, J.

On February 1, 1893, the defendant, as landlord, commenced a summary proceeding against the plaintiff, a monthly tenant, to remove him from the five rooms on the top floor, east side, of the tenement known- as Ho. 96 East. Broadway, for holding over after the expiration of his term. The defendant *320signed the petition and the affidavit accompanying it, but by some oversight on the part of the notary the latter omitted to affix- his name to the jurat. The clerk of the Fifth District Court upon this Unverified petition issued a precept returnable at . three o’clock the same day, and, on the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Fischer v. . LangbeinNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. Kerr v. . MountNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
  3. Homan v. BrinckerhoffCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1845
  4. Skinnion v. . KelleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  5. Ackerman v. FinchNew York Supreme Court · 1836

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Potter v. New York Baptist Mission SocietyAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1898
  2. Engel, Heller Co. v. Henry Elms. Brewing Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1902
  3. Griffin v. Barton, New York County Courts1897
  4. Cerana Apartments Corp. v. SolomonAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1934
  5. Wands v. Robarge, New York County Courts1898

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API