Legal Opinion
Herskowitz v. Tompkins
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 23, 1992PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The motions herein are consolidated for determination. Application brought by petitioners pursuant to CPLR article 78 (Motion No. 6044/91) in the nature of a writ of prohibition for an order prohibiting respondent Justice Harold Tompkins from proceeding any further in the action entitled Charney v North Jersey Trading Corp. (Sup Ct, Index No. 24517/88), and in the nature of mandamus for an order, inter alia, compelling the assignment of another Justice, unanimously denied. The cross motions of respondent and the additional respondent (Motions Nos. 203/92 and 224/92) to dismiss the petition…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Rush v. MordueNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- People v. MorenoNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Matter of Hogan v. Court of General SessionsNew York Court of Appeals · 1946
- Matter of Culver Contrg. Corp. v. HumphreyNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
- United States Ex Rel. Monty v. McQuillanDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1974
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Robert Marini Builder, Inc. v. RaoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Caiola v. Allcity InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Kyle v. LebovitsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Pollak v. WHC, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006