In re Crawford
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, Judge
This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office sustaining the primary examiner’s rejection, of claims 24,25, 27 and 28 of appellant’s application No. 388,175 for a patent on an earth boring method and apparatus. Claims 30, 31, 39 and 40 were originally included in the appeal, but the appeal as to those claims has been withdrawn. Fifteen claims of the application have been allowed.
Claims 24 and 27 which are representative of the appealed claims are as follows:
24. An explosive perforating unit, comprising, a hollow casing composed of imperforate…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Abbott v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
- In re DalzellCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1948
3Cited by5 opinions
- Application of Bernard L. ZenitzCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
- Application of Alexander C. McCabeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1961
- Application of Alfred R. Conti and Daniel J. MenterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
- Genetics Institute, LLC v. Novartis Vaccines & Diagnostics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Genetics Institute, LLC v. Novartis Vaccines & Diagnostics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011