Legal Opinion

Searcy v. Martin Woods Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 23, 1895PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Scott District Court. — Hon. C. M. Waterman, Judge. Plaintiff, a minor, prosecutes this action by Ms nest friend to recover of defendant, a corporation, damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff because of alleged negligence of one of defendant’s employes while, in the line of Ms employment. Defendant answers denying the alleged negligence. The- case was tried to a jury, and verdict and judgment for defendant. Plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Given, G. J.

-I. Appellant’s first contention is that the court erred in certain of the instructions given. The following is a sufficient statement of the facts and pleadings for an Understanding of the questions presented : On July 9, 1892, plaintiff, then a little over five years of age, lived with and in the care of his parents, near the yards of the Chicago, Pock Island & Pacific Railway Company in Davenport. On that and prior days the defendant corporation, carrying on the fruit business, was engaged, through its employes,'- in loading bananas, from cars standing on the ground of said…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. Sing YowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. People v. AlboriCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  3. Standard Pottery Co. v. MoudyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
  4. Trimble v. TantlingerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API