Legal Opinion
Dee v. Sweet
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided July 14, 1995No. A95A0782PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Ruffin, Judge.
Defendants William Dee and Arthur McMahon appeal from the jury’s verdict in favor of plaintiffs Robert Sweet and Ralph Wright, and the denial of their motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict.
After the acrimonious termination of the parties’ business relationship, Sweet and Wright sued Dee and McMahon asserting various claims including violations of the Georgia Racketeer Influenced & Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), fraud, libel, and tortious interference with commissions. According to the amended complaint, Dee and McMahon operated McMahon-Dee, Inc. (“MDI”), an…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Southern Cellular Telecom v. BanksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
- David Lerman, in 92-5526 v. Joyce International, Inc., a Corporation of the State of Delaware, and Norman Pell, Joyce International, Inc., in 92-5574Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Famiglietti v. Brevard Medical Investors, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
- First Federal Savings Bank v. HartCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Maddox v. Southern Engineering Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
- Metro Atlanta Task Force for the Homeless, Inc. v. Ichthus Community TrustSupreme Court of Georgia · 2015
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
- Dee v. SweetSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
- Hyperdynamics Corp. v. Southridge Capital Management, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.