Legal Opinion
In Re Wittenbrink
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided June 27, 2003No. 2003-B-0425PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
849 So.2d 18 (2003)
In re Jeffrey S. WITTENBRINK.
No. 2003-B-0425.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
June 27, 2003.
Charles B. Plattsmier, G. Fred Ours, Baton Rouge, Counsel for Applicant.
James R. Clary, Jr., Jeffrey S. Wittenbrink, Baton Rouge, Counsel for Respondent.
ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS
2Per curiam
This disciplinary matter involves one count of formal charges filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel ("ODC") against respondent, Jeffrey S. Wittenbrink, an attorney licensed to practice law in the State of Louisiana.
UNDERLYING FACTS
The parties entered into a stipulation of facts. They stipulated…
Also in this document: Dissent · Johnson; Dissent · Traylor.
3Cases cited11 opinions
- Ex Parte WallSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- In Re QuaidSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
- Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. BoutallSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
- La. State Bar Ass'n v. HinrichsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1986
- In Re ThebusIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by3 opinions
- Zaveri v. Condor Petroleum Corp.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2014
- Block v. Bernard, Cassisa, Elliott & DavisLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2005
- In re PetersSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2007