Legal Opinion

Finke v. Lemle

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 24, 1953No. 38,781PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Parker, J.:

This was an action to recover earnest money paid on a contract. The plaintiffs recovered and the defendants appeal.

On February 12, 1951, the defendants, Francis A. Lemle and Aaron Eccleston, partners, doing business under the firm name and style of Fowler Construction Company, and the plaintiffs, Louis C. Finke and Mildred Finke, entered into a contract which, so far as here pertinent, reads as follows:

“This Agreement Made and entered into this 12 day of Feb., 1951, by and between Fowler Construction Co., Meade, Kansas, party of the First…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Moseman v. L. M. Penwell Undertaking Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  2. Snyder v. EriksenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  3. Doty v. Crystal Ice & Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  4. Sluss v. Brown-Crummer Investment Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  5. Alexander v. WehkampSupreme Court of Kansas · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Mai v. City of Garden CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1954
  2. Albin v. MunsellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1962
  3. Reda v. LoweSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
  4. Kurdziel v. Van EsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  5. Folkerts v. Kansas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1962

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API