Legal Opinion
Badio v. G4s Solution USA
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided March 10, 2020No. 1:19-cv-12591Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS MARVIN BADIO, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 19-12591-ADB G4S SOLUTION USA, JOSEPH SCAGLINE, MARK SPRUILL, BROCKTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, and MICHAEL SKINNER, Defendants. ORDER BURROUGHS, D.J. 1. Based upon a review of plaintiff Marvin Badio’s (“Badio”) financial disclosures, the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) is ALLOWED. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). Because Badio is proceeding in forma pauperis, the Amended Complaint (ECF No. 4)1 is subject to screening under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). In conducting this review, the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Steven M. Desrosiers v. John J. MoranCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Miller v. NicholsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
- Posada v. Acp Facility Servs., Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2019
- Lundgren v. Universal WildeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019