Legal Opinion

Matter of Hun

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 22, 1895PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, made September 27, 1894, which affirmed an order of Special Term granting the petition of the executors of the will of Jane 0. Van Schaick, deceased, giving instructions as to the payment of certain assessments upon lands in the city of Albany. The facts, so far as material, are stated in the opinion.

Read the full summary

Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, made September 27, 1894, which affirmed an order of Special Term granting the petition of the executors of the will of Jane 0. Van Schaick, deceased, giving instructions as to the payment of certain assessments upon lands in the city of Albany. The facts, so far as material, are stated in the opinion. The question presented on this application is, simply, whether an assessment for local improvements, levied under the provisions of the charter of the city of Albany, and which has become an existing…

1Opinion of the CourtO’Brien, J.

In this case the executors asked the instructions of the court with respect to their duties and obligations to pay certain assessments, made in the lifetime of the testatrix, upon certain of the real estate devised by the will. The-courts below have held that the assessments ought not to be paid by the executors, but by the devisees who took the land under the will. The devisees claim that it should be paid by the executors, and this contention presents the only question involved in the appeal.

Jane C. Yan Schaick died May 20, 1893, leaving a will in which the petitioners were named as…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Halsey v. ReedNew York Court of Chancery · 1842
  2. Duke of Cumberland v. CodringtonNew York Court of Chancery · 1817
  3. In re the Mayor of New-YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1814
  4. Appel v. Buffalo,New York & Philadelphia Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1888
  5. Roosevelt Hospital v. Mayor, Aldermen & Commonalty of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1881

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 6 v. Town of GreenburghNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  2. Rector of Christ Church v. Town of EastchesterNew York Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Board of Education v. Village of AlexanderNew York Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Church of Christ the King, Inc. v. City of YonkersNew York Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Dinn v. Board of EducationNew York Supreme Court · 1923

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API