Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Mathews v. Mathews

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 12, 1986No. 85-CA-693Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partKliebert, Judge

I concur in the majority opinion insofar as it affirms the amount of the alimony and child support set by the trial court on May 2, 1985, but for the reasons stated by Judge Cole in Wasson v. Wasson, 439 So.2d 1208 (1st Cir.1983), contrary to the majority opinion, I do not believe the supreme court ruling in Frederic v. Frederic, 302 So.2d 903 (La.1974) prohibits the changes in alimony or child support made by an appellate court from being retroactive to the date of the trial court ruling which it corrects.

Unless stated otherwise in the opinion, when the appellate judgment became final the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Frederic v. FredericSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1974
  2. Wasson v. WassonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1983
  3. Mathews v. MathewsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API