Legal Opinion
Pfeiffer v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation Bureau
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided November 10, 1928PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBurr, J.
As stated in the brief of the counsel for the appellant:
“This appeal is from a judgment of the district court finding that the plaintiff is entitled to compensation under the Workmen’s Compensa tion Act being in the employ of an employer who (had) complied with the law relative to the payment of premium at the time of the alleged injury.”
It is conceded that the only issue before the court was whether the blindness of the defendant was caused by an injury received during the course of his employment or that his condition at that time was such as was accelerated by the injury and therefore…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Walker v. Minnesota Steel Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Gotchy v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1923
- Pace v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
- Dehn v. KitchenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
- Brown v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
3Cited by15 opinions
- Steele v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
- Rose v. John Deere Ottumwa WorksSupreme Court of Iowa · 1956
- Hanson v. Independent School District 11-JIdaho Supreme Court · 1930
- Stout v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
- Kuntz v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.