Legal Opinion

Seacoast, Inc. v. Chuck LaCouture D/B/A Cactus Energy Michael Wayne Briggs And Briggs Cockerham, L.L.C.

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)

Decided December 21, 2000No. 03-00-00178-CVPublished

1Opinion of the Court

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-00-00178-CV

Seacoast, Inc., Appellant

v.

Chuck LaCouture d/b/a Cactus Energy; Michael Wayne Briggs;

and Briggs Cockerham, L.L.C., Appellees

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 126TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 97-05423, HONORABLE LORA J. LIVINGSTON, JUDGE PRESIDING

Seacoast, Inc. ("Seacoast") appeals from a summary judgment that it take nothing by its bill of review to set aside a no-answer default judgment. Defendants in the bill-of-review action, appellees here, are Chuck LaCouture "d/b/a Cactus Energy" ("LaCouture"), Briggs-Cockerham, L.L.C.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Craddock v. Sunshine Bus Lines, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Alexander v. HagedornTexas Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Baker v. GoldsmithTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Petro-Chemical Transport, Inc. v. CarrollTexas Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Hanks v. RosserTexas Supreme Court · 1964

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API