Legal Opinion · Dissent

Plum Creek Maine Timberlands, LLC v. Vermont Department of Forests, Parks and Recreation and Vermont Department of Taxes

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided September 16, 2016No. 2014-063Published

1Dissent

Dooley, J.,

¶ 48. dissenting. On January 15, 2010, the Vermont Department of Forests, Parks and Recreation (FPR) approved logging on land owned by Plum Creek pursuant to a plan drafted and submitted by Plum Creek. Logging apparently proceeded quickly because on January 26, 2010, the staff forester of Plum Creek, the FPR county forester, along with others, visited a harvest of trees on part of Plum Creek’s forestland. The date of the visit was apparently arranged so that all could attend and the logging would be in progress; there was no significance to how much of the harvest had been…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. State of Vermont Department of Taxes v. Tri-State Industrial Laundries, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1980
  4. Conservation Law Foundation v. BurkeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993
  5. In re Williston Inn GroupSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API