Neidhart v. Areaco Investment Co.
Supreme Court of Missouri
1ConcurrenceFinch, Judge
I concur in the principal opinion and write this separate concurring opinion only *931to call attention to and underscore the waste of time, judicial effort and money-caused by a jurisdictional provision which makes it difficult for lawyers and judges to determine to which court an appeal should be taken.
In this case, an appeal was taken to the Supreme Court on the ground that the case involved title to real estate. We now hold that title is not involved and, since we have no jurisdiction, transfer the case to the Missouri Court of Appeals, St. Louis District, for redocketing, reargument and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. HarrisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1959
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
- State v. HarrisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1958
- Venator v. VenatorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1973