Legal Opinion

Clifft v. Indiana Department of State Revenue

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 1995No. 49S10-9503-TA-331Published

1Opinion of the Court

660 N.E.2d 310 (1995)

Kevin and Monica CLIFFT, Appellants,

v.

INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF STATE REVENUE and Kenneth L. Miller, Commissioner, Appellees.

No. 49S10-9503-TA-331.

Supreme Court of Indiana.

December 27, 1995.

Andrew C. Maternowski, Indianapolis, for appellant.

Pamela Carter, Attorney General, David A. Arthur, Deputy Attorney General, Indianapolis, for appellee.

ON PETITION FOR REVIEW

SHEPARD, Chief Justice.

A woman and her husband were arrested for criminal drug possession. After their arrest, the State assessed the Indiana Controlled Substance Excise Tax (CSET) against them and the wife pled…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Sullivan; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · DeBRULER.

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API