Legal Opinion

Stewart v. Taustine

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided December 16, 1960PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, Judge.

This original action seeks by writ of mandamus to require the Judge of the Louisville Police Court to impanel a jury to try the petitioner on a charge of petit larceny. The petitioner feels his constitutional rights have been abrogated by the refusal of the respondent so to do.

Without reaching the merits of petitioner’s contention we are of the opinion that the writ will not lie. Section 110 of the Kentucky Constitution invests this Court with the power to issue such writs as may be necessary to give it a general control of inferior jurisdictions. The exercise of that control…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Evans v. HumphreysCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
  2. Smith v. BurnettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1945
  3. Thompson v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1955
  4. Cadden v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1954
  5. Williams v. PiersonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1945

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hampton v. Judge of the Jefferson Circuit Court, Chancery Branch, Third DivisionCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API