Legal Opinion

SAIF Corp. v. Christensen

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 28, 1994No. Agency No. 92-15365 CA A82091PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, P. J.

SAIF seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board holding that its procedural obligation to begin paying benefits for claimant’s temporary total disability began November 11, 1991. The Board’s determination is based on its conclusion that an insurer has an affirmative obligation, in the processing of an aggravation claim, to seek medical verification of a claimant’s inability to work. We conclude that the Board erred in holding that SAIF had a procedural obligation to begin paying benefits and reverse.

Claimant compensably injured her left elbow and forearm in 1985 while working…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Reed v. Labor Force of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  2. Ake v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API