Legal Opinion

Chopra v. Prusik

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided July 21, 2005PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Order unanimously reversed without costs, occupant’s motion to vacate the default final judgment granted and matter remitted for all further proceedings.

In this summary proceeding pursuant to RPAPL 713 (5), petitioner, who purportedly acquired the property by a referee’s deed executed pursuant to a mortgage foreclosure proceeding, obtained a final judgment of possession upon occupant’s default, and occupant moved pursuant to CPLR 5015 (a) (1) to vacate the final judgment and restore the matter to the trial calendar. In our view, the court below improvidently…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Goldman v. CotterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. Nissequogue Boat Club v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. O'Frias v. MeltonNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. Public Administrator of Kings County v. SamersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  5. Ferber v. Salon Moderne, Inc.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Decaudin v. VelazquezAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2007
  2. Paladino v. SotilleAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2007
  3. 459 Webster Ave., LLC v. GreenAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API