Legal Opinion · Dissent

Elliott v. University of Illinois

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1936No. 23680. Judgment affirmedPublished

1DissentJustice Jones

The title of the act here involved is “An Act to regulate the profession of public accountants.” An examination of its several sections will reveal that there is not a provision in it which attempts to regulate the profession, as such. The sole and only purpose of the act is to create a trade name — “Certified Public Accountant” or “C. P. A.” Manifestly it was intended to give a monopoly of the accounting business to those who possess such certificates, and no pretense is made of regulating the profession of public accountants. The body of the act is not germane to the title and violates…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Braceville Coal Co. v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Toledo, Wabash & Western Railway Co. v. City of JacksonvilleIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Frazer v. SheltonIllinois Supreme Court · 1926
  4. People v. RothIllinois Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Gore v. National Ass'n of Certified Public AccountantsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API