Legal Opinion

Ford Motor Co. v. Hunt

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided December 23, 1997No. 0821971PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BENTON, Judge.

Ford Motor Company appeals from the commission’s award of disability benefits to Larry I. Hunt. Ford argues that Hunt’s activity restrictions were unrelated to his compensable injury, that the commission improperly applied the “two causes” rule, and that Hunt failed to adequately market his residual work capacity. We affirm the commission’s award.

I

Hunt suffered an injury to his right knee while working in a Ford assembly plant. He was treated by Dr. Sheldon Cohn, who placed Hunt on work restrictions, including no crawling, squatting, or lifting over thirty pounds. When Ford…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. R. G. Moore Building Corp. v. MullinsCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1990
  2. Hungerford Mechanical Corp. v. HobsonCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1991
  3. National Linen Service v. McGuinnCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1989
  4. Dollar General Store v. CridlinCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1996
  5. Caskey v. Dan River Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Wall Street Deli, Inc. v. O'BRIENCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2000
  2. Amelia Sand Co. v. EllysonCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2004
  3. Henrico County School Board v. EtterCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2001
  4. Allen v. Southern Commercial Repair, Inc.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 2003
  5. Plant Partners and v. Sheila A. PittmaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API