Legal Opinion

Queen v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided December 5, 1956No. 215-52PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

This case was referred by the court, pursuant to Rule 45 (c), to the Honorable C. Murray Bernhardt, a commissioner of the court, with directions to make findings of fact and recommendations for conclusions of law. The commissioner has done so in a report filed July 12, 1956. When more than 15 days elapsed after the filing of this report and neither party gave notice in writing of an intention to except to the commissioner’s findings or recommendations, the defendant filed a motion for judgment in accordance with the recommendations of the commissioner. Since the court agrees with the…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Martilla v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1950
  2. Heffernan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956

4Cited by6 opinions

  1. Richard L. Schlegel v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
  2. Greenway v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  3. Greenway v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
  4. McCallin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
  5. Anthony M. Crimaldi v. United States of America, United States Civil Service Commission and the Chief Executive Officer of the Postal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API