Legal Opinion · Dissent

Marshall Oil Corp. v. Adams

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 1, 1983No. 58579Published

1DissentOpala, Justice

The court allows its cognizance under Art. 7 § 4, Okl. Const., to be invoked for consideration of the petition by Marshall Oil Corporation [Marshall] to prohibit all further proceedings against it as defendant in a Grady County District Court injunction suit by which the plaintiff [Bray] allegedly launched an impermissible collateral attack upon Order No. 208017 previously made by the Corporation Commission [Commission]. For the reasons to be stated I would not assume original jurisdiction of the controversy at this stage of proceedings in the court of first instance.

Marshall brought this…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Moses v. HoebelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  2. Halliburton v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  3. White v. WhiteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  4. Adams v. District Court of Muskogee CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API