Ex Parte Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. ("Wal-Mart") seeks certiorari review of a judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals, which affirmed a judgment entered on a jury verdict against Wal-Mart in favor of Fannie Irby. Irby sued Wal-Mart, seeking compensation for injuries she sustained when she slipped and fell in spilled shampoo while shopping in the Selma Wal-Mart store. The only claim against Wal-Mart submitted to the jury was a claim of negligence, on which the jury awarded Irby $75,000. Wal-Mart's post-trial motions were overruled by operation of law, and Wal-Mart appealed. In a majority opinion, over the…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Maddox by and Through Maddox v. K-Mart Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990
- Riggs v. BellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
- Hose v. Winn-Dixie Montgomery, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1995
- Vargo v. Warehouse Groceries Management, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
- Speer v. Pin Palace Bowling AlleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hale v. KROGER LTD. PARTNERSHIP ICourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2009
- Seale v. Target Corp.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2018
- Calhoun v. Ocwen Loan Servicing LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2024
- Dalton v. Target CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2019
- Engram v. Publix Super Markets IncDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2025
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.