Legal Opinion

Frusher v. Cobb

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 6, 1940No. 34,573Published

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Allen, J.:

For the reasons stated in the original opinion (see Frusher v. Cobb, 151 Kan. 287, 98 P. 2d 89) the appeal was dismissed. A motion to reinstate the appeal was granted. A supplemental brief has been filed.

Our statute G. S. 1935, 60-2928, provides:

“The referees shall be allowed such compensation for their services as the court may deem just, and proper, which shall be taxed as part of the costs in the case.”

In Insurance Co. v. Stahl, 78 Kan. 528, 96 Pac. 854, it was held, as stated in the syllabus:

“The words ‘exclusive of costs,’ as used in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gants v. National Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
  2. Phenix Insurance v. StahlSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  3. Frusher v. CobbSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  4. Grindley v. WoodsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
  5. McCleery v. McCleery Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API