Legal Opinion
United States v. Elic L. Gilliam, United States of America v. Roy Lee Gilliam
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided September 17, 1992No. 91-5862, 91-5864PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judge:
The instant appeal was brought by Elic Gilliam (“Elic”) and his son Roy Lee Gilliam (“Roy Lee”) (collectively, the “Gil-liams”) who were convicted in a jury trial of multiple counts of money laundering, conspiracy, and intent to distribute marijuana and cocaine. Roy Lee has argued that he had ineffective assistance of counsel at trial because the same counsel represented both him and his father, who was a co-defendant. Both appellants also have argued that the Oregon search warrants were insufficient, that the offenses charged in the indictment regarding money…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- United States v. Steven C. Griffin, Marvin M. Rux, and Andrae ScurlockCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- United States v. William Arthur BrownCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. JaenschCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Harry C. KaufmannCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Johnson, CurtistineCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.