Legal Opinion

Loika v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided November 21, 1995No. 13777; 13779PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendants, Aetna Casualty and Surety Company (Aetna) and Allstate Insurance Company (Allstate), appeal from the judgment of the trial court awarding the plaintiffs damages under the under-insured motorist provisions of two automobile insurance policies. The defendants appeal claiming that the trial court improperly (1) allowed the plaintiffs to recover underinsured motorist benefits under the Allstate policy in addition to the liability coverage they had received from Allstate, (2) determined the credits and offsets to be applied against such underinsured motorist coverage, and (3) found…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nationwide Insurance v. GodeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  2. Loika v. Aetna Casualty Surety Co.Connecticut Superior Court · 1994
  3. AFSCME, Council 4, Local 681 v. City of West HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sachem Enterprises v. Southern Connecticut Gas Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1996
  2. Loika v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  3. Young v. Metro. Prop. Cas. Ins. Co., No. Cv95-0380614 (Mar. 5, 1998)Connecticut Superior Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API